Reasoning Assessment
Twenty-five questions across five reasoning domains, ordered using your earlier answers. Get observed accuracy, an estimated reasoning score and a descriptive archetype. Free, no email, about 15 minutes.
Platform · Cognition
Explore reasoning, recall and response timing through focused educational tasks. Results distinguish what you did from what the scoring model estimates. These tools are not standardized cognitive assessments.
Twenty-five questions across five reasoning domains, ordered using your earlier answers. Get observed accuracy, an estimated reasoning score and a descriptive archetype. Free, no email, about 15 minutes.
Also live
The classic digit-span task, forward and backward — your working-memory span against internal illustrative references, in about five minutes.
Test your span → Available nowSimple visual reaction time — how fast you respond to a single cue. Five scored trials, median result, honest device-latency caveats, in about two minutes.
Test your speed → Available nowCognitive throughput, not just reaction time — thirty timed same/different comparisons scored as correct judgments per minute, so both speed and errors count.
Compare fast → Available nowA mental-rotation task — same shape rotated, or a mirror image? Twelve items scored on accuracy and speed, with exact ground truth.
Rotate some shapes → Available nowAnalogies, synonyms, and antonyms across three difficulty tiers — a difficulty-weighted measure of crystallized verbal ability, in about five minutes.
Reason with words → Available nowNumber series, syllogisms, deduction, and odd-one-out across three tiers — a culture-fair, difficulty-weighted measure of fluid reasoning, in about five minutes.
Follow the logic → Available nowNumber series, word problems, ratios and data across three difficulty groups, with observed accuracy and an internal difficulty-weighted index.
Test your numbers → Available nowThe Alternate Uses Task — two minutes to list as many uses for an object as you can. Honest divergent-thinking fluency, with no automated originality rating.
Unlock some ideas →What gets measured
The reasoning exercise reports several task domains alongside its composite estimate. Differences between those tasks can add context, but they do not define a complete cognitive profile.
Spotting the rule behind a sequence and predicting what comes next — the closest thing to raw fluid intelligence, and the least dependent on anything you were taught. Test your logical reasoning → · The science →
Relationships between quantities: proportions, progressions, and structure in numbers. This is reasoning with numbers, not arithmetic recall — a calculator won't help.
Analogies, meaning, and what follows from what. Verbal reasoning leans on crystallized knowledge more than the other domains, which is exactly why it's measured separately. Test your verbal reasoning →
Holding a shape in mind and transforming it — folding, rotating, recombining. Strong spatial profiles cluster in engineering, design, and the trades. Test your rotation → · The science →
Temporary maintenance and manipulation during a short span task. Performance can change with distraction, sleep, stress, strategy and previous exposure. Test your span → · The science →
After the test
A score without context is flattery. These are the two pages that turn your number into understanding.
Conditions matter. Record distractions, fatigue and the device you used. Treat the results as a session snapshot; they do not establish a fixed ability or an empirical confidence interval.
Every range from 70 to 145+, the population share at each level, and what the labels do and don't imply.
Read InterpretationHow population percentiles work on standardized tests, and why they do not apply to AurorIQ estimates.
Read InterpretationWhat scores above 130 actually indicate, and the honest limits of any online estimate at the extremes.
ReadThe science
Plain-language guides — no jargon, no hype, no brain-training sales pitch.
What a score represents, where it comes from, and the limits of a single number.
Read FundamentalsReliability, validity, and what separates a real instrument from a flattering quiz.
Read FundamentalsWhat the research actually shows about training games and transfer to real ability.
ReadThe two engines of cognition — one you're born tuning, one you build over a lifetime.
Read DomainsWhy matrix puzzles are the purest window into raw reasoning ability.
Read DomainsMental rotation, form perception, and where spatial minds excel.
Read DomainsThe mental workbench behind every other domain — span, load, and limits.
Read MemoryA research-informed distinction and why the measures overlap.
ReadHow age norms work in standardized tests, and why AurorIQ has no age rankings.
Read PerformanceThe state factors that move your score — and how to test on a fair day.
Read All guidesEvery guide on intelligence, scoring, and cognition in one place.
Browse Assessment sciencePractice effects, familiarity and responsible retesting.
ReadChoose a focused task
The dedicated instruments above isolate different task demands. Use them as separate observations rather than combining them into a clinical or population-ranked profile.
Questions
Educational tasks for reasoning, memory, reaction time, rotation and creativity. Results show task measurements or clearly labeled internal indices. None establishes a population rank.
Because the reasoning exercise samples several different task types. Looking at the pattern across tasks can add context, but AurorIQ does not treat that pattern as a complete model of intelligence or personality.
Different task results can vary within the same session. Treat those differences as observations from this set of tasks, not as fixed labels or population-ranked strengths and weaknesses.
Fifteen minutes from now, you'll know your archetype.
Start the assessment